129810460552187500_103Yan Qiang: Mystery door line is unfair football spectators watching the new technology on original sin
Petr Cech from doors on line
TERA Gold, retaining the shooting of Carroll.
This moment in the FA Cup final, at least in the reds fans hearts of Mercy County, became a great wrong. Live television playback from multiple angles, this time shooting, still gives no good reason, found the shooting conditions. From the perspective of neutral fans, this time shooting the ball should not cross the line as a whole, in accordance with the internationalThe AFC the modified scoring rules, this is not a scoring shot.
However there is no conclusive evidence, who's to say what the ball is there? One night, Serie a Milan Derby matches, two similar questions, whether the ball?
Who can say that Chiang DAO Ming? A week after, I at Old Trafford, visiting United Kingdom soccer most famous Sir Bobby Robson, andThe elders talked about many of the football the past 75 years old. Most exciting stories is the final of the 1966 World Cup at Wembley.
Hurst's shot, whether or not scoring? "Beckenbauer is my best friend. "Jazz laughs," but over the years, every time she sees me, he said: ' Bobby, when the ball was really not into it! ����Online mystery, for football senior celebrity, and also to extend the life.
Even if behind them, people talk about the World Cup when the anecdote, will still bring this one back, but is not always a clear outcome. This seems to be the soccer of original sin, and the birth of the sport in the development process, action execution vulnerability exists on the rules, for the industryBring up too many challenges. Industry Manager, who this year are starting to look for solutions, such as UEFA started in European club competitions, implementation of the line judge system.
Only by increasing the manpower law enforcement, still cannot solve the mystery door line. So when the means of science and technology, is considered sufficient to deal with this challenge, ultimate solution appears. This spring, the nationalAFC finally lift a ban, and interviews with a number of high-tech companies, finally chose two tests through built-in smart chip the sphere, and door line video technology, to solve the questions on line.
German suspense in the finals of the World Cup, are expected to no longer reproduce. Debate continues, however, may not be the anti-high-tech-Joseph s. Blatter's tone, but how should services for high-tech means ofAudience, and how to better conform to the football match, to serve the audience. Veteran reporter arguments raised by Barclays, is now high-tech means, may be able to meet the needs of television football audience, is unfair to the audience. Because the traditional football game, first of all, is to provide services for the audience, and after the technology was introduced, the audience actually and between gamesA certain isolation. Whether it's through ball in the chip the ball into it or not, is through online video, these are only for referee of the secondary means of traditional football match in the audience and the judges, in the same space of time, participate in a football game, after the technology was introduced, maintaining the golf course results in a fair
Diablo 3 power leveling, but let the audience, were driven to aA more inferior role
Rift CD-key, the entire balance in the stadium was broken. Such a debate, sounds a little sophisticated, carefully considered, however, is to discover the truth, especially to the fans to the scene to watch the game, can better appreciate the Barclays question-any of the reasons for a football game, with its own rhythm and rhyme, of any external interference factors areEssentially influence the development of a game.
High-tech means of intervention, maintaining a balance on the pitch, but broke on the pitch a different balance, potential benefits of audience erosion, high-tech means, is to maintain and strengthen their TV audience interest. The other hand, the introduction of high-tech means, only possible in vast business interests of professional football andIn international football competitions, large areas of amateur and youth competitions, cannot bear the cost of high-tech, this will also distinguish between different levels of football. Stories on a gate line, thus became the philosophical problem in the debate. I have always thought that high-tech trend, Barclays debate, one can't help but I'm a little confused.
Others:
没有评论:
发表评论